Search the Design+Encyclopedia:

Argumentum Ad Nauseam


From Design+Encyclopedia, the free encyclopedia on good design, art, architecture, creativity, engineering and innovation.
360638
Argumentum Ad Nauseam

Argumentum ad nauseam is a type of logical fallacy that relies on the repetition of an argument to convince the listener of its truth. This fallacy is often used in debates and discussions to persuade the other party to accept a particular viewpoint. However, this type of argumentation is problematic because it does not rely on evidence or logical reasoning to support the argument. Instead, it relies on the repetition of the argument to make it appear more convincing. One of the key aspects of argumentum ad nauseam is that it is often used to manipulate the listener into accepting a particular viewpoint. This is because the repetition of an argument can create a sense of familiarity and comfort in the listener, making them more likely to accept it as true. However, this type of argumentation is not based on evidence or logical reasoning, and can be dangerous if used to promote false information or beliefs. Another key aspect of argumentum ad nauseam is that it can be difficult to identify. This is because it often appears in the form of persuasive language and rhetoric, which can be difficult to distinguish from logical reasoning. As a result, it is important to be aware of this fallacy and to be able to identify it when it is being used in a debate or discussion. In conclusion, argumentum ad nauseam is a type of logical fallacy that relies on the repetition of an argument to convince the listener of its truth. It is often used to manipulate the listener into accepting a particular viewpoint, and can be difficult to identify. It is important to be aware of this fallacy and to be able to identify it when it is being used in a debate or discussion.

logical fallacy, repetition, manipulation, persuasive language, rhetoric

James Brown

214641
Argumentum Ad Nauseam

Argumentum Ad Nauseam is a type of cognitive bias and logical fallacy. It is when someone keeps repeating the same idea or opinion over and over again, until it is accepted as true. This is often done without any evidence or proof to back up their statements. An 8 year old would understand this as someone saying the same thing again and again, expecting others to believe it, even if it isn't true and there is no evidence to back it up.

Argument, Persuasion, Repetition, Fallacy

Thomas Lee

214040
Argumentum Ad Nauseam

Argumentum ad nauseam is a logical fallacy which is often seen in arguments. It is a form of argumentative persuasion which relies on repetition to convince the listener. This form of argumentation is based on the idea that if an idea or point is repeated often enough, it will eventually become accepted as true, regardless of its actual validity or truth. This type of logical fallacy relies on a cognitive bias of the listener, which makes them more likely to accept a point if it is repeated multiple times. This fallacy can be dangerous if used to manipulate the listener into accepting false information or beliefs.

Argument, Persuasion, Repetition, Fallacy, Cognitive Bias.

Jessica Adams

CITATION : "Jessica Adams. 'Argumentum Ad Nauseam.' Design+Encyclopedia. https://design-encyclopedia.com/?E=214040 (Accessed on April 25, 2024)"


Argumentum Ad Nauseam Definition
Argumentum Ad Nauseam on Design+Encyclopedia

We have 178.961 Topics and 427.322 Entries and Argumentum Ad Nauseam has 3 entries on Design+Encyclopedia. Design+Encyclopedia is a free encyclopedia, written collaboratively by designers, creators, artists, innovators and architects. Become a contributor and expand our knowledge on Argumentum Ad Nauseam today.