Search the Design+Encyclopedia:

Argumentum Ad Consequentiam


From Design+Encyclopedia, the free encyclopedia on good design, art, architecture, creativity, engineering and innovation.
359691
Argumentum Ad Consequentiam

Argumentum Ad Consequentiam is a type of logical fallacy that is committed when one argues for the truth of a proposition based solely on its desirable or undesirable consequences. This fallacy is often used to persuade people to accept a conclusion by appealing to their emotions, fears, or desires, rather than by providing evidence or logical reasoning. It is a common tactic in advertising, politics, and other forms of persuasion. One of the key aspects of Argumentum Ad Consequentiam is that it ignores the actual evidence or reasons for accepting or rejecting a proposition, and instead focuses on the consequences of accepting or rejecting it. This can lead to faulty reasoning and false conclusions, as the truth of a proposition cannot be determined solely by its consequences. For example, just because a particular policy might have desirable consequences, it does not necessarily follow that the policy itself is true or justified. Another important aspect of Argumentum Ad Consequentiam is that it can be difficult to recognize, as it often involves subtle or implicit appeals to emotion or desire. It is important to be aware of this fallacy and to be able to recognize when it is being used in order to avoid being misled or manipulated. In conclusion, Argumentum Ad Consequentiam is a logical fallacy that occurs when one argues for the truth of a proposition based solely on its desirable or undesirable consequences. This fallacy is often used in advertising, politics, and other forms of persuasion, and can be difficult to recognize. It is important to be aware of this fallacy and to be able to recognize when it is being used in order to avoid being misled or manipulated.

logical fallacy, persuasion, evidence, reasoning, consequences

Thomas Harris

214666
Argumentum Ad Consequentiam

Argumentum Ad Consequentiam is a type of logical fallacy in which someone tries to prove something by pointing out the consequences of it being true or false. This type of argument is usually used to influence someone's opinion by making them think that the good or bad outcome of something will happen if they take a certain action. For example, if someone wants you to buy a product, they may tell you that you'll be very happy if you do. This is an example of Argumentum Ad Consequentiam.

Argument, Consequence, Bias, Logical Fallacy

Thomas Lee

213982
Argumentum Ad Consequentiam

Argumentum Ad Consequentiam is a logical fallacy that assumes that because a premise has a certain outcome, the premise must be true. This type of reasoning is seen as a cognitive bias, as it fails to take into account the other possible outcomes that could result from a given premise. This type of fallacy is commonly seen when someone concludes that an event must have a certain cause, simply because that cause is the most convenient or desirable. This type of thinking is often used to make decisions without considering the full range of evidence or other possible outcomes.

Argument Fallacy, Cognitive Bias, Logical Reasoning, Outcome Bias.

Jessica Adams

CITATION : "Jessica Adams. 'Argumentum Ad Consequentiam.' Design+Encyclopedia. https://design-encyclopedia.com/?E=213982 (Accessed on March 28, 2024)"


Argumentum Ad Consequentiam Definition
Argumentum Ad Consequentiam on Design+Encyclopedia

We have 178.961 Topics and 427.322 Entries and Argumentum Ad Consequentiam has 3 entries on Design+Encyclopedia. Design+Encyclopedia is a free encyclopedia, written collaboratively by designers, creators, artists, innovators and architects. Become a contributor and expand our knowledge on Argumentum Ad Consequentiam today.