Irrelevant conclusion, also known as Ignoratio elenchi, is a logical fallacy that occurs when an argument is made that is logically unrelated to the conclusion that is being drawn. This fallacy can occur in a variety of ways, but it is most commonly used in debates or discussions where the speaker is attempting to draw an unfounded conclusion or distract from the main point of discussion. One way that an irrelevant conclusion can occur is when a speaker uses a red herring argument. This is when the speaker introduces a topic that is not relevant to the discussion in order to distract the audience from the main point. For example, if a politician is asked about their stance on healthcare, but instead talks about their personal life, this would be an example of a red herring argument. Another way that an irrelevant conclusion can occur is when a speaker uses an ad hominem attack. This is when the speaker attacks the character or personal traits of their opponent instead of addressing the argument that is being made. For example, if a politician is asked about their stance on gun control, but instead attacks the personal life of their opponent, this would be an example of an ad hominem attack. It is important to recognize the use of irrelevant conclusions in order to avoid being misled or distracted from the main point of a discussion. By staying focused on the main point and avoiding irrelevant arguments, one can have a more productive and meaningful discussion.
logical fallacy, red herring argument, ad hominem attack, distraction, misleading
Irrelevant conclusion, also known as Ignoratio elenchi, is a logical fallacy where an argument is made that is logically unrelated to the conclusion that is being drawn. This type of fallacy is commonly used in debates or discussions where the speaker tries to draw an unfounded conclusion. It is often used when someone is trying to make a point but can't find evidence to back it up. This type of fallacy can also be used to distract from the main point of discussion.
Relevance, Argumentation, Inference, Non-Sequitur.
We have 216.552 Topics and 472.818 Entries and Irrelevant Conclusion has 2 entries on Design+Encyclopedia. Design+Encyclopedia is a free encyclopedia, written collaboratively by designers, creators, artists, innovators and architects. Become a contributor and expand our knowledge on Irrelevant Conclusion today.