Argumentum Ad Infinitum is a logical fallacy that occurs when an argument is repeated over and over again, without any new evidence or reasoning being presented. This type of fallacy is often used to distract from the real issue at hand or to defend a position that has little or no evidence to support it. It is a form of circular reasoning, in which the conclusion is assumed in the premise, and then the premise is used to support the conclusion. This type of reasoning is often used to create a false sense of certainty and to make an argument appear more valid than it really is. One of the most common examples of Argumentum Ad Infinitum is the use of slogans or catchphrases in political campaigns. These slogans are often repeated over and over again, without any new evidence or reasoning being presented to support them. This type of repetition can create a false sense of certainty in the minds of voters, even if the slogan has little or no basis in reality. Another example of Argumentum Ad Infinitum is the use of personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. Instead of addressing the issue at hand, the person making the argument will attack the character or motives of the person making the opposing argument. This type of argument is often used to distract from the real issue at hand and to create a false sense of certainty in the minds of others. In conclusion, Argumentum Ad Infinitum is a logical fallacy that involves the repetition of an argument without any new evidence or reasoning being presented. This type of fallacy is often used to distract from the real issue at hand or to defend a position that has little or no evidence to support it. It is important to recognize this fallacy and to avoid using it in our own arguments, as it can create a false sense of certainty and prevent us from considering new evidence or perspectives.
logical fallacy, circular reasoning, ad hominem, repetition, false certainty
Argumentum Ad Infinitum is a type of cognitive bias and logical fallacy. It happens when someone keeps repeating the same argument over and over again, expecting it to become true in the end. In other words, they keep saying the same thing, even though it has not been proven to be true, in the hopes that it will become true. This can be very frustrating, as it can feel like someone is not listening to the other person's point of view.
Argument, Fallacy, Cognitive Bias, Reasoning, Logic
Argumentum Ad Infinitum is a logical fallacy that involves an infinite loop or circular argument. This type of reasoning is commonly used to defend a position or to distract from the real issue at hand. This fallacy is a cognitive bias in which a person's beliefs are used as evidence to support their beliefs. This type of reasoning is often used to create a false sense of certainty and to make an argument appear more valid than it really is. It is an attempt to avoid dealing with the evidence that does not support the argument. Argumentum Ad Infinitum is a form of circular reasoning, fallacy of infinite regress, non sequitur, and begging the question.
Circular reasoning, fallacy, infinite regress, non sequitur, begging the question, argument, cognitive bias, logical fallacy
We have 216.484 Topics and 472.443 Entries and Argumentum Ad Infinitum has 3 entries on Design+Encyclopedia. Design+Encyclopedia is a free encyclopedia, written collaboratively by designers, creators, artists, innovators and architects. Become a contributor and expand our knowledge on Argumentum Ad Infinitum today.