Argument from incredulity is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone rejects a claim simply because they find it difficult to believe. This type of reasoning is flawed because the level of difficulty in accepting a claim does not determine its validity. It is a common mistake that people make when they encounter something that challenges their beliefs or preconceived notions. When someone uses argument from incredulity, they are essentially saying, I can't believe this claim, therefore it must be false. This type of reasoning is often used as a way to avoid engaging with an argument or considering evidence that contradicts one's beliefs. It is important to note that argument from incredulity is not the same as healthy skepticism or critical thinking. One example of argument from incredulity is the belief that extraterrestrial life does not exist because it seems too improbable. While it may be difficult to imagine life on other planets, this does not mean that it is impossible. Similarly, the fact that a scientific discovery or theory challenges our understanding of the world does not automatically make it false. To avoid falling into the trap of argument from incredulity, it is important to approach new information and ideas with an open mind and a willingness to consider evidence. It is also helpful to be aware of our own biases and assumptions, and to actively seek out alternative perspectives and information.
logical fallacy, cognitive bias, skepticism, critical thinking, evidence
Argument from incredulity is when someone believes something is false because it sounds too hard to believe. It's a kind of mistake that people make when they think something is wrong just because it seems too hard to be true. This is like when a kid hears about something and thinks it's impossible and so they don't believe it. It's a cognitive bias because it's a mistake in thinking that affects how a person views something.
Belief, incredulity, fallacy.
Argument from incredulity is a cognitive bias and logical fallacy which occurs when an individual rejects a claim because they find it difficult to believe. This form of reasoning is fallacious because the difficulty of believing a claim is not a valid reason to reject it. It is commonly used as a way to avoid considering a claim and is often employed when an individual lacks sufficient evidence to support their position. This form of reasoning is also known as appeal to common sense and argument ad incredulum. It is important to note that the argument from incredulity is the opposite of Occam’s Razor, which states that the simplest explanation is usually the correct one.
Argument, Incredulity, Cognitive Bias, Logical Fallacy, Evidence, Explanation, Common Sense.
We have 179.832 Topics and 428.518 Entries and Argument From Incredulity has 3 entries on Design+Encyclopedia. Design+Encyclopedia is a free encyclopedia, written collaboratively by designers, creators, artists, innovators and architects. Become a contributor and expand our knowledge on Argument From Incredulity today.